Passmore v. Multi-Management Services, Inc., 810 N.E.2d 1022 (Ind. Jun 29, 2004) (NO. 61S01-0212-CV-00637)
Passmore v. Lee Alan Bryant Health Care Facilities, Inc., 765 N.E.2d 625, Transfer Granted, See Appellate Rule 57, (Ind.App. Mar 27, 2002) (NO. 61A01-0108-CV-286)
Young v. Tri-Etch, Inc., 790 N.E.2d 456 (Ind. Jun 26, 2003) (NO.18S02-0211-CV-616)
Young v. Tri-Etch, Inc., 773 N.E.2d 298 (Ind.App. Aug 07, 2002) (NO. 18A02-0109-CV-631) Young v. Tri-Etch, Inc., 767 N.E.2d 1029 (Ind.App. May 17, 2002) (NO. 18A02-0109-CV-631)
Moberly v. Day, 757 N.E.2d 1007 (Ind. Nov 15, 2001) (NO. 07S01-0010-CV-605)
Moberly v. Day, 730 N.E.2d 768, Transfer Granted, See Appellate Rule 57, (Ind.App. Jun 22, 2000) (NO. 07A01-9906-CV-216)
Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. Stanley, 744 N.E.2d 939 (Ind. Mar 26, 2001) (NO. 14S01-0002-CV-114)
Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. Stanley, 713 N.E.2d 925, Transfer Granted, See Appellate Rule 57, (Ind.App. Jul 16, 1999) (NO. 14A01-9805-CV-164)
Peavler v. Board of Com'rs of Monroe County, 528 N.E.2d 40 (Ind. Sep 09, 1988) (NO. 36S01-8809-CV-817, 43S03-8809-CV-818)
Peavler v. Board of Com'rs of Monroe County, 492 N.E.2d 1086, Transfer Granted, See Appellate Rule 57, (Ind.App. 1 Dist. May 19, 1986) (NO. 1-185 A 15)
Peavler v. Board of Com'rs of Monroe County, 557 N.E.2d 1077 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Aug 06, 1990) (NO. 72A01-8910-CV-395)
Hinkle v. Niehaus Lumber Co., 525 N.E.2d 1243, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 11,861 (Ind. Jul 18, 1988) (NO. 63S04-8807-CV-637)
Picadilly, Inc. v. Colvin, 519 N.E.2d 1217 (Ind. Mar 02, 1988) (NO. 32S01-8803-CV-287)
Picadilly, Inc. v. Colvin, 503 N.E.2d 421, Transfer Granted, See Appellate Rule 57, (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Jan 27, 1987) (NO. 32A01-8603-CV-00065)
Qazi v. Qazi, 503 N.E.2d 894 (Ind. Feb 10, 1987) (NO. 2-585-A-172)
Qazi v. Qazi, 546 N.E.2d 866 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Nov 30, 1989) (NO. 29A02-8802-CV-00060) Qazi v. Qazi, 492 N.E.2d 692 (Ind.App. 3 Dist. May 12, 1986) (NO. 2-585 A 172)
Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Young, 852 N.E.2d 8 (Ind.App. Aug 07, 2006) (NO. 18A02-0502-CV-150)
Birch v. Midwest Garage Door Systems, 790 N.E.2d 504, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 16,621 (Ind.App. Jun 23, 2003) (NO. 41A04-0205-CV-232)
Shriner v. Sheehan, 773 N.E.2d 833 (Ind.App. Aug 06, 2002) (NO. 49A02-0108-CV-545)
Hibler v. Conseco, Inc., 744 N.E.2d 1012 (Ind.App. Mar 20, 2001) (NO. 29D03-9812-CP-672, 29A02-0002-CV-67, 30D01-9112-CP-513)
Robins v. Harris, 740 N.E.2d 914 (Ind.App. Dec 15, 2000) (NO. 84A01-0002-CV-57)
Southport Little League v. Vaughan, 734 N.E.2d 261 (Ind.App. Aug 28, 2000) (NO. 49A02-9912-CV-882)
Stamper v. Hyundai Motor Co., 699 N.E.2d 678 (Ind.App. Aug 11, 1998) (NO. 54A05-9607-CV-261)
Shewmaker v. Etter, 693 N.E.2d 608 (Ind.App. Apr 03, 1998) (NO. 49A02-9707-CV-462)
Gulley v. Winter, 686 N.E.2d 176 (Ind.App. Oct 24, 1997) (NO. 55A01-9703-CV-76)
Jostens Learning Corp. v. Education System Corp. of Indiana, 651 N.E.2d 1186 (Ind.App. Jun 20, 1995) (NO. 49A05-9410-CV-420)
Hyundai Motor Co. v. Stamper, 651 N.E.2d 803 (Ind.App. Jun 12, 1995) (NO. 54A01-9501-CV-3)
Shewmaker v. Etter, 644 N.E.2d 922 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Dec 28, 1994) (NO. 49A02-9310-CV-525)
Hammes v. Frank, 579 N.E.2d 1348 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Oct 24, 1991) (NO. 41A01-9010-CV-406)
Greene v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 573 N.E.2d 452 (Ind.App. 5 Dist. Jun 17, 1991) (NO. 18A02-9007-CV-422)
Challenger Wrecker Mfg. Inc. v. Estate of Boundy, 560 N.E.2d 94, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 12,647 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Sep 27, 1990) (NO. 52A02-8907-CV-388)
Matheis v. Farm Feed Const. Co., 553 N.E.2d 1241 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. May 15, 1990) (NO. 28A01-8908-CV-301)
Archem, Inc. v. Simo, 549 N.E.2d 1054 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Feb 07, 1990) (NO. 03A01-8907-CV-263)
Lazarus Dept. Store v. Sutherlin, 544 N.E.2d 513 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Oct 04, 1989) (NO. 30A01-8809-CV-276)
Lather v. Berg, 519 N.E.2d 755 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Mar 03, 1988) (NO. 2-285-A-56)
Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc., 519 N.E.2d 153 (Ind.App. 4 Dist. Feb 10, 1988) (NO. 15A04-8702-CV-53)
Dock v. Tuchman, 497 N.E.2d 945 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Sep 30, 1986) (NO. 73A01-8606-CV-168)
Pekin Ins. Co. v. Wheeler, 493 N.E.2d 172 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. May 27, 1986) (NO. 1-685 A 161)
Andis v. Hawkins, 489 N.E.2d 78 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Feb 18, 1986) (NO. 4-485 A 98)
Creighton v. Caylor-Nickel Hosp., Inc., 484 N.E.2d 1303 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Nov 13, 1985) (NO. 2-1184-A-355)
Nahmias Realty, Inc. v. Cohen, 484 N.E.2d 617 (Ind.App. 4 Dist. Oct 30, 1985) (NO. 4-185 A 16)
Kemper v. Warren Petroleum Corp. Inc., 451 N.E.2d 1115 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Jul 28, 1983) (NO. 2-1282 A 404)
Moridge Mfg. Co. v. Butler, 451 N.E.2d 677, 36 UCC Rep.Serv. 1548 (Ind.App. 3 Dist. Jul 20, 1983) (NO. 3-182 A 16)
Hogston v. Schroyer, 449 N.E.2d 291 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. May 23, 1983) (NO. 1-782 A 176)
Conn v. Paul Harris Stores, Inc., 439 N.E.2d 195 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Aug 31, 1982) (NO. 1-1081 A 303)
Sports, Inc. v. Gilbert, 431 N.E.2d 534 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Feb 23, 1982) (NO. 1-1080 A 284)
Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Dalson, 421 N.E.2d 691 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Jun 11, 1981) (NO. 1-1280 A 334)
Northland Ins. Co. v. Crites, 419 N.E.2d 164 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Apr 14, 1981) (NO. 1-580A139)
Needham v. Needham, 408 N.E.2d 562 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Aug 11, 1980) (NO. 1-180A14)
Cartee v. Weber, 397 N.E.2d 622 (Ind.App. 4 Dist. Dec 04, 1979) (NO. 1-379A69)
Breeden v. Swifty Oil Co., Inc., 174 Ind.App. 275, 366 N.E.2d 1206 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Sep 19, 1977) (NO. 2-1075A272)
Lankford v. Lucas, 174 Ind.App. 232, 367 N.E.2d 13 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Sep 13, 1977) (NO. 2-1075A266)
American Home Products Corp. v. Vance, 173 Ind.App. 631, 365 N.E.2d 780 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Jul 26, 1977) (NO. 2-476A169)
Walters v. Kellam and Foley, 172 Ind.App. 207, 360 N.E.2d 199 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Feb 17, 1977) (NO. 2-373A64)
Luker v. Starcraft Co., 171 Ind.App. 642, 358 N.E.2d 231 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Dec 30, 1976) (NO. 2-1075A280)
Bagwell v. Chrysler Corp., 168 Ind.App. 110, 341 N.E.2d 799 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Feb 17, 1976) (NO. 2-1074A238)
Vernon Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Graham, 166 Ind.App. 509, 336 N.E.2d 829 (Ind.App. 2 Dist. Nov 13, 1975) (NO. 2-574A123)
* The lawyers at Miller & Fisher, LLC hold AV Ratings from Martindale-Hubbell. An AV Rating is recognized as the highest rating that a lawyer can receive. This rating is achieved through the confidential voting of other lawyers and members of the judiciary and reflects both a lawyer's legal ability and ethical standards.
**Miller & Fisher, LLC has been certified as a Certified Women's Business Enterprise by the City of Indianapolis and by the State of Indiana.